What email address or phone number would you like to use to sign in to Docs.com?
If you already have an account that you use with Office or other Microsoft services, enter it here.
Or sign in with:
Signing in allows you to download and like content, and it provides the authors analytical data about your interactions with their content.
Embed code for: The Prisoner
Select a size
1 66—so, Enginer, are all here? Enginer –yes... 66—great, they don´t know that they´re dreaming... 66--... .Kill..? 2 Kill –here.... 66—tell Kahmn to bring the room back. 3 66—…suddenly, something happens, and we say, ‘this is forever’... and this seems to be the drama of the life. The desire isn’t a constant. Which are the desires of the human beings? What do they want most? Seems to be proportional to that which they hide... The Separation: what would it be of the structure of an idea if there didn’t existed the separation? How to prove the existence of anything…? We’re separated, aren’t we…? Everything in this room it´s, isn’t it...? one thing, to exist, must be separated. It´s something to be thought. And the most high of a separation it´s the unity.. it´s from where it´s extracted the concept of individuality. But I ask you sirs, What´s that which only possesses side with itself, and not with the other? How to affirm a side, without a separation? The ‘separation exists’ it´s a fixation, an abstraction of the mind. We call separation that which’s loose, a point in a plain, it´s how the objects affirm, that one thing It´s separated in function of its localization. The definition of separation it´s visual. 4 66—we may affirm an end, but may we affirm that “as the heaven cannot be seen, it is separated”? this is to affirm that the universe doesn’t possesses the side of a spiritual relation with God. Perceive that the idea of the intangible generated the latu sensu of a strange thought: the stepping away. Friends, this is a big problem. Even bigger than sex. I say bigger because it´s through the stepping away that the sex explains itself. The incredible relation between the Proper and the Intimate. Are words that one has to have in mind because they are the understanding of the matter. And the matter it´s the localization. The idea exists: but declares its existence through two different localizations. For this, to localize the center of the idea, in a first moment, may become a hard work, even to the most skillful ones, because he won’t do it without returning to the beginning. But think that the separation produces something finished: the man didn’t reached to such comprehension of the end through a sentiment. But this sentiment was rationalized, in mode that his own understanding got lost. The actual understanding of the homo sapiens, the specie that attributed to itself a self-explanation, the humanity, understands the end as something visual, through the vision. To prove the end it´s impossible, and not proving it, it´s to disaffirm the beginning. The beginning was created and turned the end possible, the phenomenon of the laterality: something that will be discussed with sir Kahmn in The Explanation of the Vision. By hour, or, at the moment, let´s follow with the idea the laterality, for this is the relation of beginning and end. 5 66—the interesting of this affirmation it´s that the man, in this sense, even though he doesn´t sees, wouldn´t never be stepped away of the earth as well. in mode that the stepping away that could not only be the solution of the problem as well as the own understanding of the position man , a localization-God, constitutes itself into a problem: how to prove the stepping away of the earth? For matters equally spirituals… yes, the earth it’s also understood as the hell…and in this sense, heaven and earth would never be separated as spiritual angles of a beginning and an end. The human being it´s the center of a geometric-spiritual matter: And seems to have reached a privileged vision, of being in two places at the same time: heaven and hell: at the same time on which he affirms to be separated from the heaven and separated from the earth. But at the same time, the stepping away confounds itself with the proximity, and the exact geometry of the question, it´s blurred: on declaring his proximity with God, geometrically, he’ll be only declaring his stepping-away of the evil, and not a total separation, not being able to declare the end without declaring the beginning, or the beginning without declaring the end. That which has the relation with the beginning and the end, it´s the middle: And this is the projection of a body. The projection of a body, it´s an idea. The idea that constructed the body it´s the testament of a dead one: The dead one it´s that one who separated himself from the nature. In the same mode, dead one it´s that one who separated himself from the heaven: and this is to deny the stepping away, or even, to misunderstand it completely: because the beginning doesn’t separate itself from the end. The human rationality stopped toward this question: the science didn’t manage to explain neither less yet closure, the understanding of beginning, middle and end: and whether it be the most usual, doesn’t possesses any materiality, for it cannot be proved by any experimental model, only in the theory: nothing that may be seen or testimonied: in the nature, the belief was not seen.: spiritually, the angle, the Holy Spirit, was quoted, as angle middle as the solution of the problem. But I the same mode, on example of what happens to the body, cannot explain the separation neither the stepping away for the same problem of end and beginning. The solution, then, for the big port theologians was to shoot themselves in the sea. And consequently, the inevitable the solution was to misunderstand the nature. Bodies aren’t cups: that which passes doesn’t habitate. In the same mode, the water doesn’t explain neither how it entered and neither how it came out. It’s believed that a society doesn’t functions without yield and without consume, at the same time in which this turns impossible the dreams: because the use wouldn’t stablish itself without the idea. What the nature affirms it´s that the functioning maintains you prisoners: in the same mode that the chain maintains you separated and arrested in the floor: this is the end. At this point, the understanding of symmetry, it’s the attribution of one unique result to the unknown: But who proposed the separation? who introduced it..? how was it given the process of separation? How was it given the process of human separation…? To the point of unitarizing all its sentiments…[?] the dead one made a declaration of death, the advantage of dying: for wanting to know his final: he needed of the end to exist. The dead ones are those which carry the sentiment of the end: The sentiment it´s a romance, its relation with its final: Only the beginning could contain the end. This is an affirmation of a relation with the universe already created, the known result. You guys want to know your final? Downey Jr –my father already terrified me with these things, I.... don´t want to. Farrell –the final of the movie..? Pitt—exactly...! what movie it´s this, that we must watch? 6 Pitt—I only watch my movies[!] and I don´t remember of having worked with this production before…. I don´t know this actor... 66—you sir don´t know this actor...? you sir still work for Hollywood? Or Hollywood doesn´t want you anymore...? because this is the script of your movie, the final it´s the script of every movie, isn’t it ..? 66—sir Depp...? Depp –yes, yes, I agree... 66—you sir agree with your final..? Depp –no, with the butterfly.... 66—and what´s with the butterfly…?? Depp –she doesn´t stops... 66—that which movements itself, doesn´t functions. 7 66—...it’s what you guys will see, how was it your final, he was equal to its beginning: and no one knows for certain when did the sinister appeared. Probably, it was in the crib. It was there that the separation began. But it treats about a continuous process, a functioning. Paul and Christ didn´t came build the idea, but, to show its functioning. It would begin with the marriage: the encounter that would happen in the world, it would mark the end of a relation: the love between the proper and the intimate: an adjust in the pointer of the time: the resurrection of the hours, the new day, the end returns to the beginning. 66—Paul wrote an Epistle, the Epistle66: it´s a very ancient Epistle, but the Vatican validates it as being Paul who wrote it: and there are still others who say that indeed wasn’t Paul, but Christ... Paul says the following: 8 66—the letter of Paul to the artists….: Letter of Paul to the Twelve: “I’ll send a crude letter to my heretic friends… they believe in everything and in all the saints, less in me… huhuhuhuhuhuhum...! the cruelty of the nude… don´t have the right to be cooked… have to live under the cold of the pan, without never being able to go to the fire… you will never run away of this faith…you will never run away from this faith looking for to be in the plate… the clay was cooked, just as the cement was composed, one doesn’t births, one doesn’t have nothing from the earth without the distaste. You don´t believe in me, period. And what I say it´s that you need to see the man ready, it was I who constructed him. It was I who sculpted them from the ready clay that God delivered to me: and what I deliver to you it’s the new man: you can believe that it was God who did, but it was I who sculpted it. For this, the face is mine: I gave him the face that he gave me. It´s what I say to my friends Jews: pay attention to your God, it was I who did: I would never give him my name, but of that which I sculpted.” 66—its content will be discussed in the own history of Paul. After the savagery, the crude meat, and now, the cooked meat… the evolution of a cannibal… it’s the explanation of how the moral evolved… and that which transformed itself into Bethel. 9 Deus—what´s this, Kahmn, an Evangelization...? Kahmn –no, the functioning .. 66—the posse over the movements, the occupation of the body. Kahmn –it´s sinister… Deus –what’s it that´s sinister, Kahmn…? Kahmn –the human action it´s an object that God created… Deus –and what´s this....? 66—it´s what we’ll see... the Functioning . 10 11 In somewhere between the heaven and the earth, it´s the Prison Heaven, the promised land that God offered to the Jews…it was a special place, they hadn’t found it until they arrive in Rome… they had already walked the entire world, and had realized that the world weren´t his, that they didn’t had constructed a world for their God, and what´s worse: they were still without earth to live in, without a body to habitate. But he knew that this place would be found, that this state of look-for would come to the end, and would end up forever this state of eternal abandonment: finally, this day arrived: the place was found. Someone founded it. For millions of years that had been a curse. But now the curse would become truth: appearing in flesh and bone: it wasn’t an interpretation anymore. Now all saw, all could see. It’s not Israel, nor Babel, neither Stone of Bethel…: The Paradise evolved, became an island in the cloud, as a well-known place…. Of the prisoners. The Paradise is, overall, the stage of a look-for, the promissed land, a theater of the mind, the place where the Proper and the Intimate will meet. The Meeting – Paul Part I: Paul the biggest crazy one of the history: the father of the craziness. He had moral support of his grand friend, Timothy, fullback of the Corinthians, from the city the Corinth, that knew Philippian, that had already played with big-Phillip, in the time of Rome. Paul in the prison was only office, not only financed the campaign as also wrote new books: he was caged for a long time already, at least about some two hundred years…. But doubtless his literary masterpiece shaked the entire world, and mainly, the one of the Jews, of the Arabs, of the black ones, of the Irish’s and baboons: it was the Gospels, the history of Christ, which he signed with four different names, thing that Paul always did while lived: no one knows not even if his name was really Paul. Paul it´s considered by many, besides all his geniality, as the biggest crazy of the history: the father of the craziness. [Paul historicity link: X ] 12 . 13 Paul –I need to write a book... 14 Paul –...I feel so lonely... Paul –....I think I’ll never get out of here.... 15 Paul –maybe I’ll die in this prison... Paul –I will never see the sunlight again.... 16 Paul –I think that in this moment, I could look to it eternally… ... Paul –... and stay blind with its obfuscate: and I would see myself me again, one another place, one new me, saved... 17 Paul –Paul, you need to save yourself… do something, Paul… . Paul –what can I do...? 18 Paul –I think that I will write my story, but not my story, properly... Paul – ... I will call it of “The history that didn´t happened”. 19 Paul –...my self-biography: but I wouldn´t like to talk about me, because... I would know that I’d be lying...[!] Paul – I would have to talk about the other someone that I am: Me: one another someone, that would have to have existed before me: that would have to have done things that I didn´t do. 20 Paul –It´s true, I didn´t do... . Paul –but I would’ve done.. 21 Paul –And I’d do, with this new me that it´s caged... Paul –but if I talk of the me that doesn´t exists, neither I would believe in this. I mean, if I talk about someone that didn’t existed, I don’t have how to speak that this someone was me… 22 Paul –but I wouldn´t have how to talk about someone else that wasn´t myself, because, after all, it´s a self-biography: why would I lie in my self-biography... and to affirm one thing that I am not, and that I never was… Paul – I can´t cheat myself... Paul, you can´t cheat yourself... 23 Paul –what do you do in this moment...? ! Paul –I can´t cheat myself...! 24 Paul –I mean, I cannot commit a mistake... for..... Paul –... if this someone never existed... 25 Paul –..he will never be able to exist as well.. Paul –I start to feel the spirit of this history..... 26 Paul –I’m already feeling myself in the clouds... I’m flying... no, floating... it´s him... it´s him… it´s him…. Paul –I mean, it’s me... I mean, it´s him and me. 27 Paul –It´s us! Paul –we encountered each other. But it´s he, it´s of him that I am talking about. I see him walking in the clouds..! now he is walking in the Field of the Olives… 28 Paul – I see his look.... 29 Paul—seems to have arrived from somewhere very far, very far , really … Paul –in somewhere in the future..!! 30 Paul – but this makes me return to the past.. Paul –but this also makes me feel my present solved. I would be in another place, in some place before him. But not properly the place before him, but his place. 31 Paul –but what place is this...? maybe I don´t know without writing the history... Paul –How good is to be there. Now he walks over the waters, what an amazing thing, he floats over the sea, as God when created the earth, it´s above the earth. Everybody sees this, Testimony his presence: It´s him, it´s me. I feel that he is me.. but he needs a name. What name will I give for him..? I will give my name... Paul... Paul... Little Paul... doesn´t sounds good... doesn´t sounds good my name.. 32 Paul –what name will I give him….? 33 Paul –I need to chose a name that isn´t him... . Paul –The Chosen One! 34 Paul – yes! The Chosen One! Because I chose him and he chose me: it was a choice: and the choice by itself defines itself. Paul – Why did I chose him... ? why did I chose him... ? I’m arrested... The Freedom... I want to be free... I want to get out of here, of this prison. 35 Paul –The Liberator ! Paul –the freedom doesn’t have the reach... it doesn´t has the power of taking me out. Why ? there exists a motive, there exists a motive of I being arrested. I desired to be here. I desired to be arrested. I wanted to free myself of myself. This prison doesn’t exist, I can get out of here. 36 Paul –Conform I was going writing the history… and this was the tonic… I passed to be visited by him, and he appeared all the days….. Paul –he appeared... 37 Paul –...touched in my hand and say… .. –the freedom, Paul..... 38 –...I have been thinking of you every day.... – inclusive, I wrote a letter for thee….. 39 –to warn thee that your day it´s close.... —It´s close, Paul... 40 –soon your freedom will arrive. – I pray for thee all the days... rest, Paul... 41 Paul –I’ve been resting... but I feel myself alone… –you are not alone.. 42 – ... whenever you think on me, I’ll be here by your side. –well, Paul, that´s it, the Path... 43 –the Path requires sacrifice... Paul –no, Lord, don´t go ...! 44 Paul – don´t leave me here alone....! —you´re not alone, it´s just think on me and I’ll return. 45 Paul –but why are you going? –for that you see your own path.... 46 –... that you chose. Paul –yes, my lord... 47 48 49 50 Paul –he was gone and I continued without understanding the freedom. And I continued writing. But all saw his miracles, everybody saw his doings... 51 Paul—but there was something more incredible that he would do… 52 Paul –that, which would turn him, forever.... Paul—…mine I dead. 53 Paul – so, finally, I saw his name. Paul –and this intrigued me, because.... 54 Paul – that was meaningful: Paul – The Prisoner. I understood that that possessed some meaning. 55 Paul –I’ve seen all the pain of that prisoner, the sacrifice of living. I understood that it treated about the sacrificed one…the sacrificed one… needed of the sacrifice… Paul –something that testimonied and could be seen as the image of the sacrifice. 56 Paul –and the sentiment was of being with the arms wide opened…. Paul –...delivering my body... 57 Paul –...with the feet sticked in the earth... 58 Paul – as a dead tree. 59 Paul –it seemed a sword sticked in the earth, a dagger carved in the chest. The sentiment of the death. Paul –that was a signal.. 60 Paul –a dagger sticked in the earth..... 61 Paul –a dagger sticked in the earth... 62 Paul –a Cross.. a crucifix... .. ... Paul –The Crucified One. 63 Paul –the cross was his signal. Paul –and in that moment, I died... 64 Paul –and in that moment, he appeared again. And I spoke... Paul – ...I knew that you would return...! 65 Paul – I thought that you had died….. Paul –and, as in a blink of eyes, he said... .... 66 —I died, but I resurrected. And when you die, you will resurrect as a glorified one, exempt of sin, pure and free of any contamination, but now I must go, you know, far from this prison, place that you will go as well and encounter with me. Paul –of course yes, yes... but when will it be? —soon... Paul –but when...? –when doesn´t matter, Paul, it won´t be important. The important it’s you believe that this day will arrive. You saw me resurrect, didn´t you? 67 Paul –of course yes..! –everyone saw.... 68 –you need to believe that you are protected from that one who arrested you here. Paul–finally I understood the freedom. Paul –they won´t touch in me... 69 –they won´t... Paul –so I will die here –you will resurrect, Paul... 70 –this isn´t the end yet. We will still encounter each other. Paul –Lord... can I call you like this...? –of course, I am your Lord... it´s in me that you must believe. Paul –of course, Lord... 71 72 Paul –and it came to pass that in a beautiful day I woke up from a deep sleep…. 73 Enginer –you guys saw what I saw? 74 All–yes... Farrell –I’ve seen the face of Christ... Downey Jr – I’ve seen the face of all… 75 76 77 66—If the love comes, before the love didn’t existed: if the love goes, it ceased to exist. The love doesn´t passes, because it´s an encounter between the one that remains and the one that stepped away. 66—How to explain the separation: where one is, the other isn´t … [?] It’s something that you sirs need to understand: there doesn´t exists stepping away in the dreams, because there doesn’t exists separation in the nature. The World it´s the strange that appeared in the nature. 78 by him, and he appeared all the days….. Paul –he appeared... 37 Paul –...touched in my hand and say… .. –the freedom, Paul..... 38 –...I have been thinking of you every day.... – inclusive, I wrote a letter for thee….. 39 –to warn thee that your day it´s close.... —It´s close, Paul... 40 –soon your freedom will arrive. – I pray f